DM cart recovery vs Klaviyo: a side-by-side model
Here is the full working behind dm cart recovery vs klaviyo: a side-by-side model — the business before the agent, the conversation that turned it, and the receipt at the end — with every figure laid out so you can drop your own numbers into the same table.
The setup
The account runs BloomCONNECT on two channels, with automatic follow-ups switched on and appointment booking wired to a shared calendar. Instructions were drafted from the website, then tightened over the first fortnight using one-click optimisation.
The funnel, with numbers
| Stage | Volume | Rate | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inbound conversations | 420 / mo | — | Comment-to-DM plus ad traffic |
| Qualified | 168 | 40% | Agent screens budget and fit |
| Booked | 92 | 55% of qualified | Booked in-chat, no forms |
| Showed | 74 | 80% show rate | Reminders in the thread |
| Closed | 22 | 30% of showed | Human closes high-ticket |
What the agent actually did
The agent handled the first reply within seconds at any hour, answered product questions from photos and voice notes, and re-framed price objections on outcome rather than discount. Human staff only stepped in at the closing stage.
Cost against return
At the Growth allowance (₱7,195/mo) the credit cost of running this volume sat well below the value of a single closed deal. The model breaks even inside the first week of a normal month.
Do the maths for your business
Take your own monthly conversation count and apply the rates above as a starting point. The matching calculator lets you change every number and see the revenue move live.